🔗 Share this article

For months, threatening communications recurred. At first, reportedly from a retired cop and a former defense officer, later from the authorities. In the end, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh states he was ordered to law enforcement headquarters and warned explicitly: keep quiet or face serious consequences.

Shaikh is one of many opposing a multimillion-dollar initiative where Dharavi – a massive informal community with rich history – faces razed and redeveloped by a corporate giant.

"The distinctive community of Dharavi is unparalleled in the world," explains the protester. "Yet the plan aims to dismantle our social fabric and prevent our protests."

Dual Worlds

The cramped lanes of this community stand in sharp opposition to the soaring skyscrapers and elite residences that dominate the settlement. Homes are assembled randomly and frequently without proper sanitation, unregulated industries produce dangerous fumes and the air is permeated by the unpleasant stench of open sewers.

To some, the vision of the slum's redevelopment into a modern district of premium apartments, organized recreational areas, contemporary malls and apartments with proper sanitation is a hopeful vision come true.

"We lack sufficient health services, roads or drainage and there's nowhere for youth to recreate," explains a tea vendor, in his fifties, who relocated from his home state in the early eighties. "The sole solution is to demolish everything and provide modern residences."

Resident Opposition

However, some, like this protester, are fighting against the plan.

All recognize that Dharavi, historically ignored as an illegal encroachment, is urgently needing economic input and modernization. Yet they are concerned that this initiative – absent of public consultation – might transform premium city property into a playground for the rich, evicting the lower-caste, migrant communities who have been there since the nineteenth century.

This involved these marginalized, migrant workers who developed the empty marshland into an extensively researched phenomenon of community resilience and commercial output, whose output is estimated at between a significant amount and $2m a year, making it among the globe's biggest unofficial markets.

Relocation Worries

Out of about one million people living in the packed sprawling neighborhood, a minority will be able for new homes in the project, which is expected to take a significant period to finish. Additional residents will be moved to barren areas and saline fields on the remote edges of the city, risking fragment a long-established community. A portion will be denied housing at all.

Those allowed to continue living in Dharavi will be provided apartments in high-rise buildings, a significant rupture from the organic, communal way of residing and operating that has supported Dharavi for so long.

Businesses from garment work to pottery and material recovery are projected to shrink in number and be transferred to an allocated "industrial sector" distant from residential areas.

Survival Challenge

In the case of Shaikh, a leather artisan and long-time of his family to call home Dharavi, the redevelopment presents an existential threat. His makeshift, three-storey operation makes garments – tailored coats, premium outerwear, studded bomber jackets – distributed in luxury boutiques in the city's affluent areas and internationally.

Household members lives in the spaces below and employees and tailors – laborers from different regions – live there, permitting him to manage costs. Away from the slum, Mumbai rents are typically 10 times as high for minimal space.

Harassment and Intimidation

In the government offices close by, a visual representation of the transformation initiative depicts a contrasting outlook. Well-groomed inhabitants gather on bicycles and e-vehicles, buying continental baguettes and croissants and enlisting beverages on a patio outside Dharavi Cafe and treat station. It is a world away from the affordable idli sambar first meal and 5-rupee chai that maintains local residents.

"This represents no development for our community," says the artisan. "It represents a massive land development that will render it impossible for residents to remain."

There is also skepticism of the business conglomerate. Headed by an influential industrialist – a leading figure and an associate of the government head – the conglomerate has faced accusations of favoritism and financial impropriety, which it disputes.

Even as local authorities labels it a joint project, the business group contributed a significant amount for its 80% stake. A lawsuit claiming that the redevelopment was improperly granted to the corporation is pending in India's supreme court.

Sustained Harassment

After they started to vocally oppose the redevelopment, Shaikh and other residents state they have been faced an extended period of harassment and intimidation – comprising communications, direct threats and suggestions that criticizing the initiative was tantamount to anti-national sentiment – by individuals they allege represent the corporate group.

Among those suspected of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c