🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate atomic negotiations with the United States as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared new appeals had been made by go-betweens to restart negotiations with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet allow the global atomic watchdog to access struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Route

The foreign minister is treading a complex route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be operating from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged stronger in military terms and mentally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Talks Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the US president asserting the sites had been destroyed. Subsequently, EU nations used their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with US participation could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Present Position

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be reintroduced in various formats if negotiations resume.

The US president recently said he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but in private Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from America either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of inactivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran states diplomacy is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Stance

In his address to the forum, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be settled by armed force. He asserted the strikes began with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with total Washington understanding and coordination, making confidence difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Final Solution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had always attempted to enforce their desires during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be active and stays the ultimate solution to address conflicts, but its criteria, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they speak to the Iranian people with the approach of dignity and honor, they will obtain a response in the identical tone."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We learned many lessons from this engagement; we have identified our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He added: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, stays intact. The facilities and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but did not succeed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have grown more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the government and the country in the aftermath of this assault."