As a Hardcore Free-Market Advocate, But Medicare for All Represents the Optimal Solution for American Health System
Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.
Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.
The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Costly
According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.
Now the government is shut down due to partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.
When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?
When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this can't continue.
I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Believe me, they will adjust.
The Way National Health Insurance Would Work
A national health insurance program would need payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning average wages pays approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company must contribute approximately 13.75%.
Does this seem expensive? Not if you compare that with what average American pays. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.
Implementation for America
In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like many our government's military, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed to third-party administrators instead of a government office.
Advantages for Small Businesses
A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).
It would make it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and alternative plans.
Free-Market Viewpoint
I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.
Considering Challenges
Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.
Time for Realistic Evaluation
As Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this current situation could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms are necessary.